![]() It does an excellent job revealing both the African and the American dimensions of African-American history. Painter is clearly adept at writing straightforward history, however, and on this front the book is lucid, engaging and topical. Thus, she inadvertently diminishes their power as complicated pieces of individual expression. Nevertheless, readers will likely be frustrated by the lack of analysis accompanying the images-Painter simply summarizes most of the art works, leaving much of their complexity and ambiguity unexplored. Her primary purpose in including artworks is to illustrate historical points and to show black Americans as creators of their own history. To be fair, Painter is a historian, not an art critic. The result is a book that contains both a compelling narrative and numerous arresting images, but that does not always successfully tie the two together. , etc.) aims not merely to provide an updated scholarly account of African-American history, but to enrich our understanding of it with the subjective views of black artists, which she places alongside the more objective views of academics. ![]() This new study by Princeton historian Painter ( Standing at Armageddon ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |